Skip to main content

The House

I am not a scholar of American governance, but from what I have read about the early years of our government the House was viewed as being more authentically representative of the will of the people than the Senate or the two other branches of government. Their powers were proscribed accordingly in the Constitution, with the Speaker of the House being after the Vice President in the line of succession.

Some time ago I realized that in my lifetime the House no longer represented the people authentically. A state would be divided in one proportion between registered Democrats and Republicans and their House seats would have a very different proportion. The state legislatures often showed the same imbalance.

A simple and thus incomplete answer has to do with the drawing of districts by the party in power every ten years. Technology has advanced to allow the drawing of districts with incredible precision to lead to maximum representation for those doing the drawing. Districts lack compactness and often reach across states to groups together certain blocs.

To my knowledge there is no process to force a more just mechanism other than the bully pulpit. SCOTUS has ruled that political gerrymandering is not prohibited by the constitution.

We are currently without a Speaker of the House and have been without one for several weeks. The Republican party does not have a consensus candidate that they can elect with their own votes and the idea of working with the Democrats seems anathema to them. They are not a functioning governing party right now and haven't been at least since Trump became the head.

I would prefer improvement of this mess to radical changes but I look at McCarthy, Jordan, Greene, Boebert, et al and don't see the path to improvement.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Betrayal

I caught a student cheating on a final exam this morning. I had a line of sight on them and watched for ten minutes as they took their cellphone out of their pocket, kept it below their table, typed into it, read it, put it away, then wrote on the exam, repeating this cycle over and over again.  I was a bit surprised as the exam was open notes but this student had not attended many of our classes, just stopping by for exams, and I conjecture that they had no notes to open. I confronted the student who admitted that they had done wrong in an inarticulate non-confessional way. By the afternoon they had signed off on the honor code violation report to avoid further investigation and possible sanctions beyond failing the exam.  Is anger the right emotion to feel now? I had a working relationship with the student, although they had not contributed much to it. They had deceived me in order to gain unwarranted advantage over their peers in the class and that is not right. I don't wan...
1 comment
Read more

Standing Your Corner

I'm a long-term David Simon fan ever since I read his book "Homicide", detailing a year-long embedding with Baltimore homicide detectives. It was clear-eyed about all of the strengths and weaknesses, good reflexes and prejudices of everyone that he met.  I enjoyed the television show that followed that he wrote for, and then of course "The Wire" on HBO and a number of his other shows---only limited by my access to streaming services.  There was a histrionic moment in a later season of "Homicide" where he just let a character vent; a homicide detective who was part-owner of a bar frequented by cops watched a particularly violent drug criminal, responsible for many unsolved homicides, come into his bar with his associates, violating the detective's territory. The detective came around the bar holding a billy club in his hand and loudly discussed his first year as a patrol officer walking a beat. His supervising officer told him that he had a corner a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Momentum

In my youth my primary social justice commitment was through Amnesty International. As an affluent white male I enjoyed freedoms that I thought ideally everyone should share; in the 1980's we had had the vine of United States support for repressive regimes that were nominally anti-Communist bearing cruel fruit and I in my small part of the world wanted to do something about that.  It was a more active support Amnesty International sought back then; nowadays they just ask me for money. We members were encouraged to write to foreign government officials to urge them to take care of political prisoners that we named, the idea being that as long as they knew that they were seen the cruelty would diminish. One letter per prisoner, because they were all human beings, not just a faceless group. I have no independent way of verifying if the hundreds of letters I wrote eased any suffering; I know that they changed me. Selfishly I am grateful. At the time I made a point of reading journalism...
Post a Comment
Read more